Priorities for Comparative Effectiveness Reviews in Cardiovascular Disease
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Priorities for comparative effectiveness reviews in cardiovascular disease.
BACKGROUND Comparative effectiveness reviews offer a systematic method to critically appraise existing research and to identify unaddressed clinical areas in cardiovascular disease where significant morbidity, mortality, and variation in the use of resources persist. To delineate and help select areas where comparative effectiveness reviews are needed, the Effective Health Care Program of the A...
متن کاملCardiovascular disease surveillance in the comparative effectiveness landscape.
As the leading cause of death in the Western world, cardiovascular disease (CVD) constitutes an enormous public health problem.1 The last 4 decades have been characterized chiefly by the postponement of CVD events and CVD related deaths until older age. Thus, the burden of CVD is increasing in parallel with the increase in life expectancy.2 Within this context, identifying persons with CVD, mea...
متن کاملMethods Reference Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews
Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, systematic reviews of existing research on the effectiveness, comparative effectiveness, and comparative harms of different health care interventions, are intended to provide relevant evidence to inform real-world health care decisions for patients, providers, and policymakers. In an effort to improve the transparency, consistency, and scient...
متن کاملMethods for setting priorities in systematic reviews.
Development and assessment of methods for setting priorities for systematic reviews is developing into a field of increasing interest amongst such groups as the AHRQ and NICE [1,2]. The Cochrane Collaboration has recently established a new Methods group entitled the ‘‘Cochrane Agenda and Priority Setting Methods Group’’ to develop methodology and advise The Cochrane Collaboration on how the val...
متن کاملCardiovascular disease outcomes: priorities today, priorities tomorrow for research and community health.
The disparities and differences in heart disease and stroke among Black, White and Hispanic populations tell a compelling and continuing story that should drive research agendas to improve health outcomes. With Black men and women having the highest prevalence of hypertension, Black females having higher rates of coronary heart disease, stroke and breast cancer than White females, and Blacks, a...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes
سال: 2013
ISSN: 1941-7713,1941-7705
DOI: 10.1161/circoutcomes.111.000046